Skip to main content

Strategy003: The Picky Bottom-Fisher

Nickname: The Eight-Condition Master Occupation: Professional Selective Bottom-Fisher Timeframe: 5-minute chart

I. What is This Strategy?​

Simply put, Strategy003 is:

  • A "pickier" bottom-fishing strategy than Strategy002
  • Needs 8 conditions met before taking action
  • Added trend filtering to avoid bottom-fishing against the trend

It's like someone whose dating requirements are "must have house, car, savings, height, education, looks, healthy parents, and good personality" - the more conditions, the fewer candidates 🤣

II. Core Configuration: Same as Strategy002​

Take-Profit Rules (ROI Table)​

Holding Time     Target Profit
─────────────────────────────
Just bought      5%
20 minutes later 4%
30 minutes later 3%
60 minutes later 1%

Translation: Same tiered take-profit as Strategy002, the longer you hold, the lower the requirement.

Stop-Loss Rules​

Hard Stop-Loss: Forced exit at 10% loss
Trailing Stop: If you've made 2%, exit when it drops back 1%

Translation: Same stop-loss strategy as Strategy002, no need to explain again.

III. Buy Conditions: All Eight Must Be Met​

This strategy's buy conditions are much more complex than Strategy002, with 8 sub-conditions divided into groups:

🎯 Group 1: Deep Oversold Confirmation (3 conditions)​

ConditionIndicatorRequirementPlain English
#1RSI< 28"SUPER oversold!" (stricter than 30)
#2RSI> 0"Data is valid" (exclude anomalies)
#3Fisher RSI< -0.94"EXTREME oversold!" (near the -1 limit)

Plain English:

Strategy: "RSI needs to be below 28, not 30, need it more extreme!" Strategy: "Fisher RSI also needs to be below -0.94, almost at -1!"

This is looking for that "can't fall any further" extreme oversold state.

🎯 Group 2: Money Depletion Confirmation (1 condition)​

ConditionIndicatorRequirementPlain English
#4MFI< 16.0"Everyone who wanted to sell has sold"

Plain English:

MFI is the Money Flow Index, below 16 means selling pressure is fully released. It's like a store clearance sale - all inventory is gone, no one left to sell.

🎯 Group 3: Price Low Position Confirmation (1 condition)​

ConditionIndicatorRequirementPlain English
#5Close vs SMA40Price < SMA"Price below mid-term moving average"

Plain English:

SMA40 is the 40-period simple moving average, price needs to be below this line. Ensures you're really buying at a "low position," not chasing highs.

🎯 Group 4: Trend Filter (choose 1 of 2)​

ConditionIndicatorRequirementPlain English
#6aEMA50 vs EMA100EMA50 > EMA100"Mid-term trend is up"
#6bEMA5 vs EMA10Golden cross"Short-term starting to bounce"

Plain English:

This group is "either/or":

  • Either EMA50 is above EMA100 (mid-term trend upward)
  • Or EMA5 just crossed above EMA10 (short-term bounce starting)

This is not bottom-fishing against the trend! If the trend is still going down, even if oversold, won't buy.

🎯 Group 5: Momentum Reversal Confirmation (2 conditions)​

ConditionIndicatorRequirementPlain English
#7FastD vs FastKFastD > FastK"Momentum starting to go up"
#8FastD> 0"Momentum is valid"

Plain English:

Stochastic Fast's D line needs to be above the K line, showing momentum is turning upward. And D line must be greater than 0, excluding anomalies.

IV. Protection Mechanism: Same as Strategy002​

Protection TypeTrigger ConditionPlain English
Fixed Stop-Loss10% loss"Lost too much, accept it and leave"
Trailing StopProfit drawdown 1% (after profit > 2%)"Made money and want to run? Not so fast!"

Critique: The conditions doubled compared to Strategy002, but stop-loss settings are exactly the same. This might be an area for optimization - theoretically, stricter conditions could accept looser stop-losses?

V. Sell Logic: Same as Strategy002​

The sell signal is simple:

SAR > Close Price  AND  Fisher RSI > 0.3

Plain English:

  1. SAR > Close Price: Price broke below the SAR "umbrella"
  2. Fisher RSI > 0.3: Momentum has exited the extreme oversold zone

Strategy: "SAR has flipped, Fisher RSI has also left extreme oversold..." Strategy: "SELL!"

VI. This Strategy's "Personality Traits"​

✅ Pros (Compliment Time)​

  1. High Signal Quality: 8 conditions filter out only "premium picks"
  2. Has Trend Filter: Doesn't bottom-fish against the trend, avoids catching falling knives
  3. Money Flow Confirmation: MFI ensures selling pressure is fully released
  4. Extreme Value Capture: Fisher RSI < -0.94 captures true bottoms

⚠️ Cons (Critique Time)​

  1. Too Few Signals: 8 conditions all met? Might wait forever 🙄
  2. Overfitting Risk: More conditions = better historical performance, worse live trading
  3. Missing Opportunities: Waiting for "perfect signals" might miss good bounces
  4. Hard to Debug: 8 conditions, hard to troubleshoot when something goes wrong

VII. Applicable Scenarios: When to Use It?​

Market EnvironmentRecommendationReason
Reversal after deep correction✅ RecommendedDesigned exactly for this scenario
Oscillating downtrend✅ Can useCan capture high-quality signals
Continuous crash⚠️ Use cautiouslyConditions too strict, might miss
One-way uptrend❌ Don't useNo buy opportunities

VIII. Summary: How Good Is This Strategy?​

One-Sentence Review​

"A quality-over-quantity bottom-fisher, filtering premium picks with eight conditions"

Who Should Use It?​

  • ✅ Traders who prioritize signal quality
  • ✅ People who don't mind low trading frequency
  • ✅ Those who want to avoid false signals
  • ✅ Patient people who can wait

Who Should NOT Use It?​

  • ❌ People who want frequent trades
  • ❌ People who don't like waiting
  • ❌ Trend-following traders
  • ❌ People without patience to debug parameters

My Recommendations​

  1. Backtest against Strategy002: See if the extra 4 conditions really improved win rate
  2. Consider relaxing some conditions: e.g., RSI < 28 to < 30, Fisher RSI < -0.94 to < -0.9
  3. Keep the trend filter: EMA trend filter is good stuff, recommend keeping
  4. Small position testing: Few signals, go light and slow

IX. What Markets Can This Strategy Make Money In?​

9.1 Core Logic: The Art of Selectivity​

Strategy003's philosophy is: Better to miss than to make mistakes.

Unlike Strategy002 which buys when "four conditions are met," it requires "all eight conditions in place." It's like dating - Strategy002 says "just needs a house," Strategy003 says "needs house, car, savings, height, education, looks, healthy parents, and good personality" - more conditions means (theoretically) higher success rate, but fewer opportunities.

9.2 Performance in Different Markets (Plain English Version)​

Market TypePerformance RatingPlain English Explanation
📈 Reversal after deep correction⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐This strategy was born for this scenario
🔄 Oscillating downtrend⭐⭐⭐⭐☆Can catch high-quality bounces, but few signals
📉 Continuous crash⭐⭐☆☆☆Conditions too strict, might not get a single signal
⚡️ One-way uptrend⭐☆☆☆☆Nothing for you here, go home and rest

One-Sentence Summary: Those who can wait should use it, those who can't should go around.

X. Want to Run This Strategy? Check These Configurations First​

10.1 Trading Pair Configuration​

Configuration ItemSuggested ValueComment
Number of trading pairs20-50Too few signals, need more targets
Timeframe5mDefault setting, don't change

10.2 Parameter Tuning Recommendations​

ParameterDefault ValueTry AdjustingReason
RSI< 2830Slightly relax, increase signals
Fisher RSI< -0.94-0.9Slightly relax
MFI< 1620Slightly relax
EMA groupKeep-Trend filter is important

10.3 Hardware Requirements​

This strategy needs a bit more computing power, but still manageable:

Number of Trading PairsMinimum MemoryRecommended MemoryExperience
1-102GB4GBSmooth
10-504GB8GBStable

XI. Bonus: Strategy002 vs Strategy003 Comparison​

Comparison ItemStrategy002Strategy003
Number of buy conditions48
RSI threshold< 30< 28
Money flow indicatorNoneMFI < 16
Trend filterNoneEMA moving average group
Oversold confirmationBollinger lower bandFisher RSI < -0.94
Pattern confirmationHammerNone
Signal frequencyLowVery low
Theoretical win rateMediumHigh (theoretically)
Debugging difficultySimpleMedium

The Author's Thinking:

Strategy003 seems to be an "evolved version" of Strategy002. The author felt 4 conditions weren't enough, so added 4 more.

But... are more conditions really better?

Backtesting might look great, but live trading might have almost no signals in a year.

Recommend backtesting both strategies yourself before deciding which to use.

XII. The Very End​

One-Sentence Review​

"A strictly selective bottom-fishing strategy, for patient quality-seekers"

Who Should Use It?​

  • ✅ People who prefer high win rate over high frequency
  • ✅ People with patience to wait for signals
  • ✅ People who dislike false signals
  • ✅ People who want to learn multi-indicator combinations

Who Should NOT Use It?​

  • ❌ People who want frequent trades
  • ❌ Impatient people
  • ❌ People who don't like debugging parameters
  • ❌ People expecting daily operations

Manual Trader Recommendations​

If you're a manual trader, this strategy's logic can be simplified:

  1. Find coins with RSI < 28
  2. Check if Fisher RSI is also < -0.94
  3. Check if MFI is < 16
  4. See if EMA50 is above EMA100 (trend upward)
  5. If all met, consider entering

XIII. ⚠️ Risk Reminder Again (Read This Part!)​

Backtesting Looks Great, Live Trading Needs Caution​

Strategy003's biggest risk is overfitting:

More conditions make it easier to "fit" parameter combinations that look good historically.

Simply put: You memorized past test answers, but next time the exam questions are different.

Hidden Risks of Complex Strategies​

  • Too Few Signals: Might go months without a signal, easy to lose patience
  • Missing Opportunities: Waiting for "perfect signals" might miss lots of profitable opportunities
  • Hard to Debug: 8 conditions, hard to troubleshoot which one is wrong
  • Live Trading Deviation: Good historical performance ≠ good future performance

My Recommendations (Real Talk)​

1. Backtest against Strategy002, see if added conditions really help
2. Consider relaxing some conditions, increase signal frequency
3. Keep the trend filter (EMA group), this is the essence
4. Small position testing, don't go all-in
5. If signals are really too few, consider reducing condition count

Remember: No matter how good the strategy is, no signals means useless. More conditions are a double-edged sword - used well it's selection, used poorly it's self-comfort. 🙏